
Meeting
Hampshire Police and Crime Panel (Statutory Joint Committee) - Hampshire
Scheduled Time
Friday, 2nd July 2021
1:00 PM
Friday, 2nd July 2021
3:00 PM
Actual Time
Friday, 2nd July 2021
12:00 AM
Friday, 2nd July 2021
12:00 AM
Confirmed; Confirmation Hearing for appointment to the role of Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner
02 Jul 2021
Ashburton Hall, Elizabeth II Court, The Castle, Winchester
Councillor Simon Bound
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Present, as expected
Councillor David Stewart
Isle of Wight Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Dave Ashmore
Portsmouth City Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Stuart Bailey
Hart District Council
Apologies
Councillor Narinder Bains
Havant Borough Council
Present, as expected
Councillor John Beavis MBE
Gosport Borough Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Trevor Cartwright MBE
Fareham Borough Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Phillip Lashbrook
Test Valley Borough Council
Apologies
Councillor Matthew Magee
Southampton City Council
Apologies
Councillor David McKinney
East Hampshire District Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Ken Muschamp
Rushmoor Borough Council
Apologies
Councillor Margot Power
Winchester City Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Mark Steele
New Forest District Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Ian Stephens
Isle of Wight Council
Present, as expected
Councillor Tony Jones
Additional Local Authority Member
Present, as expected
Councillor Matthew Renyard
Additional Local Authority Member
Present, as expected
Shirley Young
Independant Co-opted Member
Present, as expected
Councillor Ian Bastable
Fareham Borough Council
Not required
Councillor Geoffrey Blunden
New Forest District Council
Not required
Councillor Tina Campbell
Eastleigh Borough Council
Not required
Councillor Angela Clear
Winchester City Council
Not required
Councillor Kirsty Mellor
Portsmouth City Council
Not required
Councillor Alex Rennie
Havant Borough Council
Not required
· Councillor Stuart Bailey, Hart District Council
· Councillor Tonia Craig, Eastleigh Borough Council
· Councillor Andrew Joy, Hampshire County Council
· Councillor Phillip Lashbrook, Test Valley Borough Council
· Councillor Matthew Magee, Southampton City Council
· Councillor Ken Muschamp, Rushmoor District Council
No declarations were made.
- Document 2021-07-02 Police and Crime Panel Confirmation Hearing Deputy PCC Explanatory Report 24 Jun 2021
- Document PCC Report 24 Jun 2021
- Document PCC Report - Appendix A 24 Jun 2021
- Document PCC Report - Appendix B 24 Jun 2021
- Document Police and Crime Panel - Letter to PCC regarding confirmation hearing outcome 24 Jun 2021
- Document Police and Crime Panel - Confirmation hearing report 24 Jun 2021
Members received a report setting out the powers of the Panel and the process to be followed in the Confirmation Hearing, as per the agreed ‘Confirmation Hearing protocol’. The Panel noted the information provided by the Commissioner relating to the appointment of the Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner, which included:
· The name of the preferred candidate and CV;
· A statement/report from the PCC stating why the preferred candidate met the criteria of role;
· The terms and conditions of appointment;
The Commissioner expressed her pleasure in presenting the preferred candidate, and welcomed the input of and feedback from the Panel through the confirmation hearing process.
The Commissioner explained that it was essential, in her role, to be visible to residents and partner organisations. In order to achieve that visibility the Commissioner was proposing the appointment of a DPCC, who would complement her skillset and be inward focussed, supporting delivery of the Police and Crime Plan. Further, Members heard that due to the number of commitments on the Commissioner’s time senior officers, including the Chief Executive and Deputy Chief Executive, had substituted for the PCC at various meetings and the Commissioner was keen to release their time to focus upon service delivery.
Members heard that the Commissioner and the candidate had worked together successfully in the past and that the Commissioner felt the candidate would offer her both challenge and support and would be able to effectively represent the Commissioner and her views. The Commissioner explained that the proposed candidate had a good understanding of risk management, public sector finance and budgeting processes and the separate and interrelated role of key statutory partners.
Discussion was held between the Panel and the Commissioner regarding the decision to appoint a DPCC, through which the Panel heard that:
· Had the Commissioner taken the approach of selecting a candidate based on geographical representation then some parts of the policing area would have lost the opportunity to meet with her directly, with a DPCC representing those areas in her place. To compliment the Commissioner’s strength in engaging with the public and partners she sought, instead, to identify a candidate who could demonstrate strength in delivering inward facing priorities, through an analytical approach.
· The costs of the OPCC would not be increased through this appointment and the salary for the role was set by the Home Office at 75% of the salary of the PCC.
The candidate introduced himself, providing an overview of his past experience relevant to the role. The Panel then asked questions of the candidate which related to his professional competence and personal independence, the answers to which enabled Members to evaluate Mr Stubbs’ suitability for the role. At the end of questioning, the Chairman thanked the candidate and provided an opportunity to clarify any responses given.
While there may be a public interest in disclosing this information, namely openness in the deliberations of the Panel in determining its recommendation regarding the proposed appointment, it is felt that, on balance, this is outweighed by other factors in favour of maintaining the exemption, namely enabling a full discussion regarding the merits of the proposed appointment.
The Panel agreed that:
· The Commissioner required a Deputy, not only to support delivery of her role, but also to release senior staff officers at the OPCC to focus on their proper areas of responsibility.
· The candidate had a clear understanding of the Commissioner’s vision of the Deputy role and provided thoughtful, genuine responses to questions posed.
· The PCC and the candidate had developed a strong working relationship over a number of years in previous roles and the confirmation hearing process had demonstrated how their skillsets would complement each other in the role of PCC and DPCC.
· The strength of the candidate’s experience in project delivery, finance and his analytical approach would support the PCC in the delivery of the Police and Crime Plan.
· The candidate was keen to learn and absorb the information required to be effective in the DPCC role.
The Panel also noted some reservations about the candidate proposed, for which it was agreed reassurance would be sought from the Commissioner:
· The candidate stated that he would remain in his position as a local authority councillor for a period of 9-10 months, but would not stand for re-election 2022. Concerns were raised about the candidate’s ability to fully commit to the role of Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner during this period.
· As both the Commissioner and candidate had similar political and geographic backgrounds, the Panel would require evidence, going forward, that the PCC and DPCC understood the needs of and could be representative of all communities across the policing area.
On the basis of the information provided by the Commissioner, and the discussions held in the Confirmation Hearing, the Panel agreed unanimously the proposed recommendation in relation to the appointment of the preferred candidate to the role of Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner
RESOLVED:
That the proposed candidate, Mr Luke Stubbs, is recommended to be appointed to the position of Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner.
Join the Discussion
You need to be signed in to comment.
Sign in